A 3-man panel of Justices of the appellate court held that the judgment delivered by Justice Bello Kawu of a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) was a nullity because the suit was unlawfully instituted, having not complied with any known law.
Ubah, candidate of the Young Progressive Party (YPP) in the February 23, 2019 senatorial elections had in January this year approached the Court of Appeal to upturn the judgment of Justice Kawu, which ordered his removal from the Senate over alleged certificate forgery.
Delivering judgment in the appeal, the court held that its findings revealed that the originating summons that led to Ubah’s sack was not signed by counsel to the plaintiffs.
Ubah had in a motion filed on March 6, 2020 by his lead lawyer, Dr Onyechi Ikpeazu SAN, urged the court to hold that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to have heard the matter in the first place because the originating summon was incompetent having not been signed by the lawyer who instituted the legal action.
In its ruling, the appellate court agreed that the failure to sign the originating summons was fatal to the case as well as the judgment which arose from it.
According to Justice Stephen Adah, for the court process to command legitimacy, it must be duly signed, adding that the rule of court makes signing mandatory.
“An incompetent originating process cannot activate the jurisdiction of the court. Therefore in the instant case the court processes are defective and incurably bad.
“The law is clear and unambiguous that it is mandatory that originating process must be signed, this is fundamental that validity of originating summon must not be in dispute.
“Any originating summon not signed by a counsel who issued it out is worthless and incompetent”, he said.
Also delivering judgment in the main appeal, Justice Adah held that the judgment and the entire process, having been found incompetent cannot be affected by section 285 which makes a case invalid if not filed within 14 days.
The Court of Appeal also held that there was no evidence that Senator Ubah was given fair hearing before judgment was entered against him at the lower court
Justice Adah also held that the lower court in the first instance ought not to have heard the case since the cause of litigation arose outside its jurisdiction.
It would be recalled that Ubah was declared winner of the February 23, 2019 Anambra South Senatorial election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and was accordingly sworn in as a Senator of the 9th Assembly last year.
His election was also upheld by the Anambra State National Assembly Election Petition Tribunal and the Court of Appeal.
However, Justice Bello Kawu delivering judgment on April 11, 2019, in a suit filed by one Anani Chuka nullified Ubah’s election on the premise that he allegedly used a forged National Examination Council (NECO), certificate to contest the senatorial election that brought him into office as Senator.
Justice Kawu on January 17, also refused Ubah’s application seeking a setting aside of his sack order on the grounds that the application lacked merit.
The court after sacking Ubah ordered INEC to withdraw the certificate of return it issued to Ubah and issue a fresh one to Dr. Obinna Uzoh of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), who came 2nd at the election.
Miffed by the decision, Ubah had on same day approached the Court of Appeal to set-aside the judgment which he insisted occasioned grave miscarriage of justice against him.
Respondents in the appeal include; Anani Chuka, Young Progressive Party (YPP), INEC and Dr Obinna Uzoh as 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th respondents respectively. SHARE THIS NEWS USING ANY OF THE BUTTON BELOW PLACE YOUR TEXT ADVERT BELOW ⬇⬇⬇